Subject: JEMX Monday Meeting 2005-08-29 Present: SB, JC, NL, CAO, CBJ, NJW JEM-X status (CBJ): IPF files show little hot spot activity, but the level has decreased considerably. JMX1 has been operated nominally since the period of high particle background. SVR-5.0 (NJW): There are some issues to resolve vis-à-vis the spectral extraction in revolutions 39-44. In some cases the gain history could be improved and for some there are strange off-axis behavior (in JMX1 revol. 42 there could be a numerical error in the ARF). SB: perhaps the role of deadtime (incl. grey filter) should be investigated in more detail. It was decided to spend some more time to understand what is going on for the purpose of making better spectral extraction. j_cor_gain (CAO): Suggestino that the fitting parameters could be put in the gain history table headers. This would minimize the impact on the data structure. An alternative suggestion: A new table should be attached to the original gain history table in basically the same format but with table rows with time intervals suitable for linear interpolation. This would serve the purposes: - could be handmade for particularly difficult revolutions and known HV changes could be incorporated at exact times - since linear interpolation does not involve fitting the result would be unique i.e. not depending on a particular fitting method. The requirement on ISDC would be to rerun the correction step for the archive and update all gain history tables - some taylor made. To begin with this action is only needed for particularly troublesome revolutions. The requirement on CAO would be to make a version of j_cor_gain that looks for this new extension and performs a linear interpolation if it is found. Otherwise the extension should be created (?). Xe-line position (CAO): New curves for the line position have been made. Both for JMX1 and JMX2 there is an increase in position in the about 100 days in continuous operation whereafter the increase levels off (Epoch 5 for JMX2 and Epoch 8 for JMX1). Do we need more IMOD periods ? A plot of the detector spectrum showing the Xe and Mo lines is a good sanity check of the accuracy of the energy correction. It ought to be done by ISDC on a regular (perhaps for every 10 ScWs) as a supplement of the QLA or status monitoring. Source positions in j_ima_iros (NL): The parameters for j_ima_iros have been changed with the new delivery of IMOD (version 13). There is a definite improvement, but it is not quite good enough. Make a comparison with results from CBJ 'private' software. SDAST meeting 22-23/9 2005 (NL): We should be prepared with notes on - spectral extraction (NL) - j_cor_gain proposal (CAO) - Xe-line position/width plots (CAO) - spectral analysis vs. ARF (NJW) - ... (?) Crab calibration (SB): The effect of the low energy cut-off can be analyzed both for the Fe calibration sources in JMX1 but also with the Crab spectrum when the HV is lowered e.g. in 5 levels, spending 10 ks at each. If we don't get a higher TM allocation the Crab should propably be off axis by 2 deg to avoid the grey filter cutting in but in a fixed position during the exercise. An OMC flatfield can also be used in which case the calibration lines will give the expected data. NOB /NJW External participants in the meeting are: Peter Kretschmar, Stefan Larsson, Stéphane Paltani, and Andrii Neronov. Unfortunately Silvia Martinez has another meeting at that time. Tim Oosterbroek may attend the meeting but at least he will have some time to help with software and analysis testing. ---------- Niels J. Westergaard Danish National Space Center Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK 2100 Copenhagen O Phone: +45 35325705; FAX: +45 35362475