Subject: JEMX Monday Meeting 2004-06-01 Participants: CAO, JC, CBJ, NL, NJW, ILR 1) JEMX status JEM-X1 HV was reduced one step in revolution 198 2) Update of JEM-X performance report We have two documents to update - the Observer's Manual (edited by Astrid Orr) where updates must be delivered soon. We have a specific list of questions from AO. - the JEMX scientific validation report that must be handed over to ISDC (Isabelle Lecoeur) by end of June. A special DSRI meeting will be devoted to this, but inputs will be requested from SDAST members. 3) Pixel Illumination Function CBJ has determined the rotation of the collimator with respect to the microstrip pattern to be JMX1 : 0.17 deg JMX2 : 0.03 deg by folding shadowgram data modulo the collimator period (7.06 mm) for the Crab at an offaxis angle of 2 deg (to make collimator shadows broader) NL will freeze these in his fitting to get the Crab lightcurve right (read constant) across many science windows. An update of the 'skymap'matrices is underway but needs more checks for bugs. CBJ remarked that the count rate in the detector area unaffected by the collimator could be compared to the total count rate in order to find the on-axis throughput. This result can be compared with the thicker collimator walls derived from the NL analysis. 4) Analysis of Xe line from PK's detector spectra JC has looked at the detector spectra extracted by Peter Kretschmar. Those spectra were obtained by using ISDC S/W (BIN_S level in the pipeline) for a number of arbitrary ScWs, over the whole detector inside a radius of 105 mm (default value) and corrected for both spatial and gain variations. A semi-automatic tool has been developed to analyse the Xenon line energy position and resolution. The spectra can be divided in two classes: 1) those for which the background is clear and the Xenon line obvious and 2) those for which a strong source is inside the FoV and hence the Xenon line is much less apparent. The analysis tool can find a Xenon line in 94% of the 912 JEM-X1 spectra and their average energy position is 30.17 keV (standard error 1.2 keV) for an average width of 2.9 keV, that is an average energy resolution of 9.6%. No temporal trend is found in the position of the Xenon line. For the 3698 JEM-X2 spectra, a part corresponding to a period during which the HV cut-off was too low has to be excluded from the analysis before it is possible to say how much the Xenon line deviates from its expected position. This work is proceeding. (Text from JC) 5) ISDC activities SM has been at ISDC the last week. NJW will probably go there June 14. AOB: NL has been at an extra ISWT meeting where the issue of Galactic Center observation vis-a-vis Russian time was discussed. Wishes for more background observations i.e. extragalactic pointings were also presented. /NJW ---------- Niels J. Westergaard Danish Space Research Institute Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK 2100 Copenhagen O Phone: +45 35 32 57 05; FAX: +45 35 36 24 75 Hej Niels Jørgen, Her er mit bidrag til JEMX møde referat. Du må gerne klippe/ændre i teksten. JC has looked at the detector spectra sent by Peter Kretschmar for 3 weeks ago. Those spectra were obtained by using ISDC S/W (SPE level in the pipeline) for a number of arbitrary ScWs, over the whole detector inside a radius of 105 mm (default value) and corrected for both spatial and gain variations. A semi-automatic tool has been developed to analyse the Xenon line energy position and resolution. The spectra can be range in two classes: 1) those for which the background is clear and the Xenon line obvious and 2) those for which a strong source is inside the FoV and where the Xenon line is much weaker. The analyse tool can find a Xenon line in 94% of the 912 JEM-X1 spectra and their average energy position is 30.17 keV (standard error 1.2 keV) for an average width of 2.9 keV, that is an average energy resolution og 9.6%. No temporal trend is found in the position of the Xenon line. For the 3698 JEM-X2 spectra, a part corresponding to a period during which the HV cut-off was too low has to be withdrawn before it is possible to say how much the Xenon line moved from its expected position. This work is proceeding. Jérôme -- Dr. Jérôme CHENEVEZ Dansk Rumforskning Institut Danish Space Research Institute Juliane Maries Vej 30 http://www.dsri.dk/~jerome DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Tel. +45 35 32 57 03 FAX: +45 35 36 24 75