Gain Notes for Revolution 1985 This revolution was devoted entirely to observations of SCO X-1, which is so strong that it produces two pronounced effects that compromise the energy calibration of the JEM-X instruments: 1) The sheer flux of the source during on-axis observations means that the grey filter is activated automatically, reducing not just the number of science photons that are processed, but also removing a significant fraction of the calibration photons. So that during the on-axis periods of the dithering pattern, it is not possible to calibrate the instrument as accurately as with normal observations of fainter sources, or off-axis observations of SCO X-1. There simply are not enough calibration photons in the data stream to find the position of the Xe instrument lines. 2) The high photon flux suppresses the gain a strong and non-linear way so that the Xe line becomes an essential part of the energy calibration, even when a good fix on the Fe calibration line is obtained. This non-linear effect can only be corrected by use of the Xe line, which may, or may not be visible. 3) The strong astronomical source, the effect of grey filtering and the large variation in the instrumental gain, combine to wash out the weaker instrumental lines from Cu and Mo, which cannot be seen during this revolution. These effects can be seen directly in the instrumental gain table for the revolution where deep dips are superimposed on the usual shape of the gain history. Each dip shows where the instruments have passed over the strong source in the dithering pattern, and the gain suppressed according to the strength of the source in the FOV. This is one of the later revolutions in the mission where the calibration sources have become so weak that for the best energy determination and IC Gain History table is needed. To get optimal results with this revolution it is necessary to use the IC gain history. See notes in revolutions prior to revolution 1433 to find out how to do this if you don't already know. All offline gain/energy corrections (including the IC tables) are based on the two Fe calibration sources in JEM-X1, for both units. Latest OSA software (version 10 and higher) automatically cuts out the first Science windows of data from each revolution to ensure that people do not use data from the instrument-settling period. This process can be overruled, but only by experienced users. JEM-X1 rating: Acceptable (Of the well-determined Xe lines, all but one SCW has a position within about 4% of ideal. Due to the reasons described above this situation cannot be improved upon, and extreme caution should be used when using data from the on-axis science windows for energy-sensitive applications (spectra, energy-binned lightcurves and images). JEM-X2 rating: Acceptable. Identical comments as those for JEM-X1. CAO 10/08/2018