Gain Notes for Revolution 1473 This is one of the later revolutions in the mission where the calibration sources have become so weak that for the best energy determination and IC Gain History table is needed. NB: This revolution shows several sharp dips in gain where the countrate spikes, and the general plate gain dips are somewhat delayed compared to the calibration spectra dips, leading to a slight gain mismatch during these periods - also we can expect to see a non-linear response to these transient events that will also lead to poor gain correction during these periods. To get optimal results with this revolution it is necessary to use the IC gain history. See notes in revolutions prior to revolution 1433 to find out how to do this if you don't already know. Latest OSA software (version 10 and higher) automatically cuts out the first Science windows of data from each revolution to ensure that people do not use data from the instrument-settling period. This process can be overruled, but only by experienced users. JEM-X1: NB: This revolution shows several sharp dips in gain where the countrate spikes, and the general plate gain dips are somewhat delayed compared to the calibration spectra dips, leading to a slight gain mismatch during these periods - also we can expect to see a non-linear response to these transient events that will also lead to poor gain correction during these periods. The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows very good to acceptable gain correction with all science windows (taken 1 at a time) having a Xe level within 2-5% of the ideal, except for the very first SCWs. Outside of the periods mentioned above, gain correction is very good. As usual, it is recommended that users avoid the first few science windows for energy-sensitive applications (automatically removed by OSA 10.0). Calibration source number 4 (purple/orange) is no longer used for calibration purposes since an anode strip directly under the source has broken and no useable signal comes from this area of the detector any longer. JEM-X2: The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows very good gain correction with all science windows (taken 1 at a time) having a Xe level within 2-5% of the ideal, except for the first SCWS. As usual, it is recommended that users avoid the first few science windows for energy-sensitive applications (automatically removed by OSA 10.0). As with JEM-X1, source 4 is no longer used for energy correction purposes due to a broken anode strip CAO 01/12/2014