Gain Notes for Revolution 1384 This is one of the later revolutions in the mission where the calibration sources have become so weak that for the best energy determination and IC Gain History table is needed. To get optimal results with this revolution it is necessary to use the IC gain history table that has been created offline at DNSC, instead of the gain history table created automatically by OSA. If you have the newest package of IC files from ISDC and these are correctly installed, OSA will find the IC gain history table automatically and you don't need to do anything else. The updated ISDC Instrument Characteristics can be downloaded from http://www.isdc.unige.ch/integral/download/osa_sw However, if you don't have the IC gain table package from ISDC you can download the table from the gain history archive by anonymous ftp through the link provided. Download the table to some suitable subdirectory for your analysis, then set the hidden OSA parameter gainHist: gainHist="/". These files are used instead of the automatically generated gain history tables wherever there has been an unusual or non-linear behaviour of the detector gain. JEM-X1: The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows excellent gain correction with all except the very first science window having a Xe level within 2% of the ideal. As usual however, it is recommended that users avoid the first few science windows for energy-sensitive applications. Calibration source number 4 (purple/orange) is no longer used for calibration purposes since an anode strip directly under the source has broken and no useable signal comes from this area of the detector any longer. Calibration source number 2 (yellow/pink) has become too noise to use probably due to the decay of its strength during the course of the mission, and is also no longer used. JEM-X2: The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows very good gain correction with all science windows, except the very first SCWs and three other points, having a Xe level well within 2% of the ideal. Even the 3 outlying points are well within 3% of ideal. As usual however, it is recommended that users avoid the first few science windows for energy-sensitive applications. CAO 18/02/2014