Gain Notes for Revolution 1012 This is a SCO X-1 observation revolution so that there is a good deal of strong grey filtering of both the science and calibration events, leading to a great deal of scatter in the calibration data and results. This situation is only made worse by the revolution being split up into a large number of science windows (96 pointings) This is one of the later revolutions in the mission where the calibration sources have become so weak that for the best energy determination an IC Gain History table is needed. To get optimal results with this revolution it is necessary to use the IC gain history table that has been created offline at DNSC, instead of the gain history table created automatically by OSA. If you have the newest package of IC files from ISDC and these are correctly installed, OSA will find the IC gain history table automatically and you don't need to do anything else. The updated ISDC Instrument Characteristics can be downloaded from http://www.isdc.unige.ch/integral/download/osa_sw However, if you don't have the IC gain table package from ISDC you can download the table from the gain history archive by anonymous ftp through the link provided. Download the table to some suitable subdirectory for your analysis, then set the hidden OSA parameter gainHist: gainHist="/". These files are used instead of the automatically generated gain history tables wherever there has been an unusual or non-linear behaviour of the detector gain. JEM-X1: The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows acceptable gain correction as far as can be determined within the scatter and the large number of misfitted outliers due to grey filtering. All except the very first science windows and the outliers have a Xe level within 3% of the ideal. As usual however, it is recommended that users avoid the first few science windows for energy-sensitive applications. Calibration source number 4 (purple/orange) is no longer used for calibration purposes since an anode strip directly under the source has broken and no useable signal comes from this area of the detector any longer. JEM-X2: The Xe line analysis performed using the IC table shows very good gain correction with all except the very first science windows and various misfitted outliers having a Xe level within about 2% of the ideal. As usual however, it is recommended that users avoid the first few science windows for energy-sensitive applications. CAO 01/02/2011