SDAST Chat Meeting #112: Wednesday 26th April 2006
	
Participants: Niels Joergen Westergaard (logging), Jerome Chenevez, Stephane
	Paltani
	
Subjects discussed: SDAST meeting minutes (no comments)
	Hardware trigger limits for bright source observations
	Using GTIs
	Determining ARFs from gain	


**** Logging Started : Wed Apr 26 11:16:33 MEST 2006
**** Saving Window
<jerome> Hej Niels Joergen!
<jerome> END
> Hello, sorry about my forgetfulness, do you have any comments for the SDAST
> meeting minutes? END
<stephane> Hello NJW (quite a bit more convenient in the long term, sorry!) END
<silvia> Hej NJW ! I'm afraid I've not read them yet ! Then, no comments until 
now. END
> To Stephane: quite alright, although I might prefer NJ simply END
<jerome> No more comments from my side. END
> Jérôme: do you have some experiences from ISDC that you want to share with
> us at this moment ? END
<stephane> OK, Humm, I did read the minutes, probably got a few minor points, 
but I do not remember which ones... I should read again the text.
<stephane> I should learn to be faster at this thing too !! END
<jerome> Nothing special. We have discussed with Stephane about the HW limits 
and Sco X1 GTI limits problem,
<jerome> we agreed that in a first time it might be worth trying to run the 
analysis without the GTI level. END
<stephane> I thought a bit more about it, and this won't work
<stephane> Indeed, if we skip GTI, we use those from the SCW pipeline. What we 
need to have
<stephane> is a specific update to the LIM file that we would communicate to the 
Observer
<stephane> For the archive, we need a more clever solution... END
<stephane> Copenhagen, cold you tell us what HK parameters need to have their 
LIM changed and to which values? END
> This discussion wil continue, I believe. I'll communicate your question to
> Niels and Søren. END
<stephane> For the complete solution, I think we will wait until Søren comes to 
ISDC (in June, I think) END
<jerome> OK. Otherwise everything is running smoothly for JEM-X here, I guess. 
END
<stephane> We had a question for you, NJ: to which level are you sure that
<stephane> you are going to use the gain coefficients to calculate the ARFs? Is 
it already 100% sure? END
> It has not been coded yet, but the plans are that it will be prepared for.
> Obviously we need a way out if the information on gain is not available,
> but otherwise it is 100% sure. END
*** Signoff: stephane (Ping timeout)
*** Signoff: jerome (Ping timeout)
*** Signoff: silvia (Ping timeout)
> We had a (so far) temporary black out END